CONSIDER-19-CRC
Communicating Surgical Decision-Making during the COVID-19
pandemic: colorectal cancer
Chief Investigator
|
Institution
|
Dates
|
Funding Stream
|
Amount
|
Dr Leila Rooshenas |
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation
Trust
|
01/10/2020 to 30/09/2021
|
Above and Beyond Bowel Cancer Legacy 2020-21
|
£20,952.00
|
Summary
The COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has changed how NHS care is
delivered. The surge of critically unwell patients has led to many
services being cancelled or postponed, including planned operations
for bowel cancer. Usual approaches to treating bowel cancer have
also needed to adapt for safety reasons, to reduce the risk of
exposing patients to COVID-19. However, a short pause or change to
normal bowel cancer services can also have potentially serious
effects on patients' quality of life and survival.
While the peak of infections may have passed, resuming normal
NHS services will take time. The NHS recommends a system to
prioritise patients, to ensure those most in need receive their
operation first, in as safe a way as possible. There will, however,
be a backlog of patients awaiting surgery, and some may be offered
non-surgical or palliative care.
Healthcare professionals need to clearly communicate information
about delays and changes to bowel cancer treatment with patients.
These conversations can be complex, but it is important they are
delivered well, so that patients can make informed decisions and
adhere with clinical recommendations. We will study these
conversations, and ask healthcare professionals and patients about
their views on changes to bowel cancer services and what may
improve their experiences in the current climate. We will share our
findings to improve how healthcare professionals communicate with
patients about cancer treatment and the consequences of COVID-19.
We will also use our findings to plan future research to improve
cancer care during and after the pandemic.
Findings
The initial findings have implications for surgeons, hospital
Trust managers, and policy makers managing surgical provision for
future medical emergencies and in the recovery stages of the
pandemic.
- Better support is needed for surgeons tasked with prioritising
patients. COVID-19 pressures have arguably exposed more healthcare
professionals to these contentious decisions, including those who
may not have typically had to consider resource allocation in their
day-to-day practices.
- Fuller consideration could be given to identifying and
addressing the barriers and facilitators to drawing on independent
sector provision in the event of restricted access to NHS surgical
capacity.
- Bodies responsible for producing guidance should commit to
streamlining the quantity of guidance produced, strive for the
content to be digestible, unambiguous, and aligned and as far as
possible, draw on up-to-date peer reviewed evidence.
Further implications are in development.
Outputs
Conferences - oral presentations
13th International Society for Priorities in Health
Conference: Fair Priorities in Unjust Circumstances, 28 - 30 April
2022 Norway. Oral presentation: Prioritisation in the United
Kingdom National Health Service during a national emergency: a
qualitative case study of surgical teams' experiences of colorectal
cancer surgery in the acute early stages of the Covid-19
pandemic.
HSR-UK Conference, 5-7 July 2022, Sheffield. Oral
Presentation: Patient experiences of being diagnosed and treated
for cancer the during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study of
patients with colorectal cancer.
Publications
Managing demand for surgery when needs outstrip resources: a
UK-based qualitative investigation of the challenges and solutions
to colorectal cancer surgery provision in the first wave of the
COVID-19 pandemic. Drafted for the BJS and currently being
reviewed by the CONSIDER-19 study team for submission in March
2022.
A second paper is in preparation and will focus on the
patient perspective of considering and receiving surgical care
during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Opportunities for a related synthesis paper with colleagues
involving multiple surgical specialisms is under
consideration.
Larger grants
Contributed to successful renewal of Bristol Biomedical Research
Centre (BRC) ('communication' workstream within £3.6m Surgical
Innovation theme).
Other project outcomes
This project has catalysed new collaborations with surgical
teams in Imperial College London, Gloucester Royal Hospital,
Wythenshawe Hospital and University Hospitals Leicester.
The project has also fostered inter-disciplinary collaborations
amongst researchers in the School of Physiological Sciences and
Population Health Sciences. The findings arising from surgeon
interviews have informed a project that aims to inform updated
guidance around aerosol generating procedures in the recovery
phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The findings from this project, particularly around the
challenges of prioritisation are informing the work of a related
NIHR funded project to evaluate NHS England's Evidence-Based
Interventions (EBI) programme (NIHR130547).